# Fitbuild

> A decision helper for beginner vibe coders. Four questions, a ranked AI coding tool and plan, and the reason — not another tool directory. Prices were checked on October 19, 2026.

Fitbuild ranks an AI coding tool and a plan for a beginner. The prices below are the public plan prices. A price marked verify was incomplete or conflicting on the official page.

Homepage: https://fitbuildai.com
Price changes: https://fitbuildai.com/price-changes

## Cursor

[Cursor](https://fitbuildai.com/tools/cursor)

An editor with agents, built for people who can read a diff.

Cursor is a VS Code-style editor plus a CLI and cloud agents. New customers buy it on The X Subscription: Free, Plus at $8, Premium at $30, Super at $100, and Ultra at $200. Paid plans share one weekly pool for Cursor's own models with Grok. Third-party models are not included; on Premium and above they bill at API list price from prepaid credit. Older Pro and Pro+ plans still exist only for people who already subscribed.

Cheapest paid plan the ranking counts: Plus at $8/mo.

Best for:
- A web app or SaaS you will keep editing in a repo
- Scripts and automations next to existing code
- People who can follow a diff even if they did not write it

Not great for:
- Publishing a landing page without looking at code
- A native iOS or Android app you expect a form to ship
- Games that need a scene editor

Free plan (Free): Free includes limited Agent and Chat, plus Tab completions on Cursor's own models. Cursor does not publish a request count.

Plans:
- Free (individual): Free, verified. Limited Agent and Chat requests, and Tab completions on Cursor models (Grok and Composer). No published request count. Third-party models are not available.
  The current free plan on cursor.com/pricing. Legacy Hobby is the same kind of limited trial for older accounts.
- Plus (individual): $8/mo, verified. Base weekly pool for Cursor models (Grok 4.7, Grok 4.6, Grok 4.5, and Composer 2.5), shared with Grok. Fast is off and effort is medium. No Auto, Cloud Agents, third-party models, or your own API keys. The pool size is not published as a prompt count.
  Annual is $80/yr on Cursor's pricing docs.
  The entry paid plan. Cursor recommends Premium, not Plus, for new agent users.
- Premium (individual): $30/mo, verified. 4x Plus usage of the weekly Cursor-model pool. Adds Cloud Agents, Automations, Origin, Bugbot, and third-party models at API list price from prepaid credit. Third-party models are not included in the $30.
  Annual is $300/yr on Cursor's pricing docs.
  Cursor's pricing page calls this the plan for new AI users.
- Super (individual): $100/mo, verified. 15x Plus usage, plus priority model access at peak times. Third-party models bill the same way as on Premium.
  Annual is $1,000/yr on Cursor's pricing docs.
  The plan Cursor points daily agent users to.
- Ultra (individual): $200/mo, verified. 50x Plus usage, plus earliest access to new products and models. Third-party models bill the same way as on Premium.
  Annual is $2,000/yr on Cursor's pricing docs.
  For several agents or automations, not a first plan.
- Teams Premium seat (team): $30/user/mo, verified. Same weekly usage as individual Premium. Third-party models add the Cursor Token Rate of $0.25 per million tokens.
  Teams seats are $30, $100, or $200. Plus is not a team seat.
- Teams Super seat (team): $100/user/mo, verified. Same weekly usage as individual Super.
- Teams Ultra seat (team): $200/user/mo, verified. Same weekly usage as individual Ultra.
- Hobby (legacy) (individual): Free, verified. Agent, Chat, and Tab with limited usage. No Cloud Agents, Bugbot, or Origin. No on-demand usage. No published request count.
  The free plan from before The X Subscription. Not sold to new customers. Left out of budget matching so it does not duplicate Free.
- Start (India only) (individual): ₹649/mo, tax inclusive, verified. Cursor Models pool only. No Other Models pool. Fast mode and effort controls are off. No on-demand usage.
  Legacy regional plan. The legacy plans page still lists ₹649/mo, tax inclusive. Left out of US-dollar budget matching.
- Pro (legacy) (individual): $20/mo, marked verify. Two monthly pools: Cursor Models and Other Models. Older help text listed $20 of included Other Models usage. The current legacy plans page no longer prints that dollar amount. Unlimited Tab. On-demand after the pools, if you turn it on.
  Not sold to new customers. The $20 price is on the legacy plans page. The included Other Models dollar amount is no longer published, so this row stays Verify and does not count toward the budget.
- Pro+ (legacy) (individual): $60/mo, marked verify. Same two monthly pools as legacy Pro, with more of each pool. Older help text listed $70 of included Other Models usage. The current legacy plans page no longer prints that dollar amount.
  Not sold to new customers. The $60 price is published. The $70 pool figure is not, so this row stays Verify.
- Ultra (legacy) (individual): $200/mo, marked verify. Same two monthly pools, with more of each than legacy Pro+. Older help text listed $400 of included Other Models usage. The current legacy plans page no longer prints that dollar amount.
  Not sold to new customers. The $200 price is published. The $400 pool figure is not, so this row stays Verify. New customers buy Ultra on The X Subscription instead.
- Teams Standard (legacy) (team): $40/user/mo, verified. Standard team allowance of both monthly pools. The legacy plans page still lists 5x that allowance on Teams Premium.
  Existing teams only. The comparable new seat is Teams Premium at $30/user/mo.
- Teams Premium (legacy) (team): $120/user/mo, verified. 5x the Standard team allowance. Usage is per seat and does not transfer.
  Existing teams only. The comparable new seat is Teams Super at $100/user/mo.

When the limit hits: On The X Subscription the included pool refreshes weekly, and unused included usage does not roll over. Legacy Cursor plans reset monthly with the billing cycle.
- On a paid X Subscription plan, add prepaid credit or wait for the weekly reset. Third-party models on Premium and above are paid from that credit from the first request.
- Plus is Cursor's own models only, at fixed settings. Premium is the tier Cursor recommends for new agent users. It adds cloud agents and third-party models.
- If agent use empties the weekly pool, move from Premium to Super or Ultra instead of relying on top-ups.
- Free does not include third-party models. Upgrade if the limited allowance stops the work.
- Legacy Pro, Pro+, and Ultra still reset monthly and can turn on on-demand usage. Those plans are not sold to new customers.

Last updated: October 19, 2026.

## Claude Code

[Claude Code](https://fitbuildai.com/tools/claude-code)

A terminal coding agent that shares your Claude plan.

Claude Code is included with paid Claude plans and draws from the same usage pool as Claude on the web, desktop, and mobile. There is no separate Claude Code subscription. The free Claude plan does not include it.

Cheapest paid plan the ranking counts: Pro at $20/mo.

Best for:
- Developers who want an agent in the terminal on an existing repo
- Web app and automation work where you already have a project
- People who also want Claude chat and are fine sharing one allowance

Not great for:
- Anyone who needs a free coding agent (free Claude does not include Claude Code)
- No-code site or app building in the browser
- Native mobile publishing or game engines

Free plan (Free): Free Claude does not include Claude Code. You need Pro or Max before this tool exists for you.

Plans:
- Free (individual): Free, verified. Claude chat only. Claude Code is not included.
  Do not plan a coding workflow on the free plan.
- Pro (individual): $20/mo, verified. Includes Claude Code. At least 5x Free chat usage per five-hour session, plus weekly limits. Shared with claude.ai. No fixed prompt count.
  $17/mo when billed annually ($200 up front).
  Anthropic's pricing page lists $20 monthly and $17/mo annual.
- Max 5x (individual): $100/mo, verified. 5x Pro usage per five-hour session, higher output limits, and a weekly cap. Max also has a separate weekly limit for Fable, and the pricing table caps Fable at 50% of weekly limits. Includes $100/mo of platform API credits that Anthropic says cannot be spent inside Claude Code.
  Price is from Anthropic's Max plan help article. The marketing page says Max starts at $100.
- Max 20x (individual): $200/mo, verified. 20x Pro usage per five-hour session, plus a separate weekly limit for Fable (50% of weekly limits on the pricing table). Includes $200/mo of platform API credits that do not spend inside Claude Code.
  Price is from Anthropic's Max plan help article, which lists Max 20x at $200/mo.

When the limit hits: A rolling five-hour window, plus weekly limits on paid plans. Chat and Claude Code share one pool.
- Wait for the five-hour window or the weekly reset. There is no fixed message count.
- Switch to a cheaper model so the same window lasts longer.
- On a paid plan, turn on usage credits and keep going at API rates.
- Move Pro to Max 5x, or Max 5x to Max 20x, if you hit the cap on most working days.
- For a heavy sprint, a Claude Console account with API credits is the other path Anthropic documents.

Last updated: October 19, 2026.

## OpenAI Codex

[OpenAI Codex](https://fitbuildai.com/tools/openai-codex)

A coding agent included with ChatGPT, not a separate app subscription.

Codex is the coding agent in the ChatGPT apps and CLI. You do not buy it on its own. Free and Go include a limited trial. Plus is the first plan with expanded Codex. Pro tiers are for longer daily sessions, and credits extend eligible use after the included allowance.

Cheapest paid plan the ranking counts: Plus at $20/mo.

Best for:
- Developers who already pay for ChatGPT and want the coding agent in that allowance
- Web apps and automations with local and cloud tasks
- A few focused coding sessions a week on Plus

Not great for:
- A visual no-code builder for sites and SaaS
- Staying on the free plan for real project work
- Native mobile shipping or game production

Free plan (Free): Free includes a limited Codex trial. OpenAI does not publish a fixed prompt count. It is enough to see the product, not to build through the month.

Plans:
- Free (individual): Free, verified. Limited trial access to Codex and limited access to GPT-5.6. Codex pricing docs also list GPT-6 Luna at Standard speed in the desktop app, subject to rollout. No published prompt count.
  Confirmed on the Codex pricing page as a limited trial. GPT-6 Luna on Free is listed as subject to rollout, so it is not treated as a guarantee.
- Go (individual): Confirm on chatgpt.com/pricing, marked verify. Limited Codex, above Free. Codex pricing docs at learn.chatgpt.com/docs/pricing list Go at $8/mo. chatgpt.com/pricing still did not print a dollar amount on 2026-10-19.
  Left out of budget matching. The $8 figure is on a Codex pricing doc, and the live ChatGPT pricing page still does not show it.
- Plus (individual): $20/mo, verified. Expanded Codex for a few focused sessions a week. Codex app on macOS and Windows. Local and cloud usage share the allowance. Weekly limits may apply. GPT-6 Astra access is limited, with credits for more.
  Plus is $20/mo on OpenAI's help center. Annual billing is not offered.
- Pro 100 (individual): $100/mo, verified. Higher Codex allowance for longer daily sessions. GPT-6 Astra is included in the allowance. Ultrafast is not included.
  From OpenAI's Pro tiers help article.
- Pro 200 (individual): $200/mo, verified. More included usage than Pro 100. Ultrafast is not included. New subscriptions may have a lower allowance than older Pro 200 accounts.
  OpenAI says the monthly price remains $200.
- Pro 500 (individual): $500/mo, verified. Highest included Pro usage. Ultrafast for GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol is included and draws the included allowance at 8× the Standard rate for that model.
  Ultrafast is only on this Pro tier. The 8× rate is from OpenAI's Pro tiers help article.

When the limit hits: Plan allowance, with weekly limits that may also apply. Local messages and cloud chats share it. OpenAI does not publish one universal reset clock.
- Switch to a lower-cost model. OpenAI says that stretches the same allowance.
- Check the Codex usage dashboard, or run /status in the CLI.
- Buy credits for eligible Codex use after the included allowance. Credits do not unlock every ChatGPT feature.
- Move from Plus to Pro 100, Pro 200, or Pro 500 if sessions are daily rather than a few times a week.
- Fast mode draws included allowance at 2.5× Standard. Ultrafast, only on Pro 500, draws it at 8× for GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol.
- GPT-6 Astra is only limited on Plus. It sits inside the Pro allowance on the $100 and $200 plans.

Last updated: October 19, 2026.

## GitHub Copilot

[GitHub Copilot](https://fitbuildai.com/tools/github-copilot)

An IDE assistant at $10 a month, if you already live in GitHub.

Copilot is an IDE assistant, agent, and CLI measured in GitHub AI Credits. Paid plans keep code completions unlimited. Pro is the only verified individual plan in this set at $10. Free exists, and the exact free allowance is worth re-checking because GitHub's own pages describe it two ways.

Cheapest paid plan the ranking counts: Pro at $10/mo.

Best for:
- A developer who wants an assistant inside VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub
- Staying near $10 a month
- Web app and script work where you already have the repo open

Not great for:
- Building a SaaS from a browser prompt with hosting included
- No-code landing pages
- Native mobile or game production

Free plan (Free): Free is real, with a tight cap. The plans FAQ still says 2,000 completions and 50 chats. A later billing post describes limited completions plus limited chat and agent usage. Confirm the live counter.

Plans:
- Free (individual): Free, marked verify. A limited free tier. The plans FAQ still lists 2,000 completions and 50 chat requests. The billing docs say 2,000 completions a month plus an AI credit allowance whose size is not stated, with auto model selection only.
  The free price is real. On 2026-10-19 the chat allowance and the credit allowance still disagree across GitHub's own pages, so this row stays verify.
- Pro (individual): $10/mo, verified. 1,500 AI credits a month (1,000 base + 500 flex). Completions and next edit do not use credits. 1 credit = $0.01.
  From GitHub's usage-based billing docs for individuals.
- Pro+ (individual): $39/mo, verified. 7,000 AI credits a month (3,900 base + 3,100 flex). Completions stay unlimited.
  Flex allotments can change. Base credits are tied to the subscription price.
- Max (individual): $100/mo, verified. 20,000 AI credits a month (10,000 base + 10,000 flex).
  The individual plan for sustained agent work.

When the limit hits: Monthly. Included credits do not roll over. Base credits are used before the flex allotment.
- Wait for the monthly reset.
- Set a dollar budget for extra credits. GitHub prices additional credits at $0.01 each, so $10 is 1,000 credits.
- Switch to a lighter model. Credits burn faster on larger models and agent runs.
- Move Pro ($10, 1,500 credits) to Pro+ ($39, 7,000) or Max ($100, 20,000) if you hit the cap mid-month.
- Completions and next-edit suggestions stay unlimited on paid plans. If only chat and agent stopped, you can keep editing with completions.

Last updated: October 19, 2026.

## Lovable

[Lovable](https://fitbuildai.com/tools/lovable)

A browser builder for web apps, with a hard monthly cap on the free plan.

Lovable turns a prompt into a hosted web app. The free plan can start a small project, then stops granting daily build credits after 30 in a calendar month. Paid plans add code export, custom domains, and a credit ladder that starts at $25 for 100 credits.

Cheapest paid plan the ranking counts: Pro 100 at $25/mo.

Best for:
- A web app or SaaS you want to describe in the browser
- A marketing site when you also want a simple app behind it
- Beginners who do not want to open an editor on day one

Not great for:
- Native iOS or Android apps
- Games
- Terminal scripts and repo-wide refactors
- Free-plan projects you need to export (code download starts on Pro)

Free plan (Free): 5 build credits a day, capped at 30 per calendar month, plus 20 Cloud credits, 4 AI credits, and 1 connector credit. You cannot edit or download the code, or attach a custom domain, until Pro.

Plans:
- Free (individual): Free, verified. 5 build credits per day, maximum 30 per calendar month. 20 Cloud credits, 4 AI credits, and 1 connector credit per month. No code edit, code download, or custom domain.
  Daily credits resume on the 1st at 00:00 UTC after the monthly cap.
- Pro 100 (individual): $25/mo, verified. 100 monthly credits, plus 5 build credits every day with no monthly cap. 20 Cloud credits, 4 AI credits, and 1 connector credit per month. Code edit, download, custom domain, badge removal. Top-ups are $15 per 50 credits.
  Annual is $250 ($21/mo), two months free versus monthly.
  The ladder runs from 100 to 10,000 credits. Higher rungs cost more. See the Pro tier table in Lovable's docs.
- Pro 200 (individual): $50/mo, verified. 200 monthly credits. Same Pro features as the $25 tier.
  Annual is $500 ($42/mo).
- Business 100 (team): $50/mo, verified. 100 monthly credits, plus the same monthly Cloud, AI, and connector grants as Pro. SSO and governance features. Top-ups are $30 per 50 credits.
  Not an individual starter plan. The Business ladder also runs to 10,000 credits.

When the limit hits: Daily build credits reset at 00:00 UTC and do not roll over. On Free they stop after 30 in a calendar month until the 1st. Paid monthly credits last two months from issue.
- On Free, wait until the next UTC day, or until the 1st if you already used 30 build credits.
- Use the daily chat allowance for questions that do not need a build credit.
- Upgrade to Pro at $25 for 100 monthly credits. Students and teachers can get 50% off that tier for up to 12 months.
- Top up at $15 per 50 credits on Pro, or move up the credit ladder if you are buying top-ups every week.
- If the app is now a real codebase, export it on Pro and finish in an editor tool so you are not paying credits for every tweak.

Last updated: October 19, 2026.

## Bolt.new

[Bolt.new](https://fitbuildai.com/tools/bolt)

A browser builder with a generous free token pool and a $25 Pro plan.

Bolt builds web apps in the browser and bills in tokens. The free plan is one of the more usable trials in this set: 1 million tokens a month, with a 300,000 token daily cap. Pro starts at $25 for 10 million tokens and removes the daily cap. Bigger projects spend more tokens per message because Bolt resends project context.

Cheapest paid plan the ranking counts: Pro at $25/mo, marked verify.

Best for:
- A first web app or landing page you want to see running today
- Beginners who want a free month of real building, not a 10-message demo
- People who may later edit the generated code in the code view

Not great for:
- Large existing repositories
- Native mobile apps and games
- Long-running production apps, because token cost rises as the project grows

Free plan (Free): 1 million tokens per month and a 300,000 token daily cap. Public and private projects, Bolt branding, and a 10MB upload limit. Direct edits in Code view do not spend tokens.

Plans:
- Free (individual): Free, verified. 300K tokens per day and 1M tokens per month. Bolt branding, 10MB uploads, hosting up to 333k web requests.
  Daily leftover tokens do not carry into the next day.
- Pro (individual): $25/mo, marked verify. Starts at 10M tokens per month, no daily cap. Unused paid tokens roll for one extra month. Custom domain, no Bolt branding, 100MB uploads.
  Billing docs say annual saves 10%. A worked example on the same page lists the Pro 10M annual plan at $216/year, which is not 10% off $25/mo. Confirm the annual price in the upgrade dialog.
  The pricing page lists Pro at $25/mo as the starting individual paid plan. The monthly price is used for matching. The annual rate is marked verify because the billing page states both 10% off and $216/year.
- Teams (team): $30/member/mo, verified. 10M tokens per member per month. Tokens are not pooled across the team.
  Per member, not a shared bucket.

When the limit hits: Free tokens reset on the 1st and do not roll over. The daily 300K cap resets every day and also does not roll. Paid tokens reset on the renewal date and roll for one extra month while the subscription stays active.
- On Free, wait for the daily reset, or for the 1st if the monthly million is gone.
- Keep editing existing files in Code view. Bolt says those direct edits do not use tokens.
- Upgrade to Pro at $25 to drop the daily cap and start at 10 million tokens a month.
- Higher token tiers and token reloads exist. Reload price depends on the plan, so read the live reload dialog instead of guessing.
- If each message is getting expensive, the project is large. Export and continue in an editor.

Last updated: October 19, 2026.

## Replit

[Replit](https://fitbuildai.com/tools/replit)

A browser IDE and agent, closest thing here to an all-in-one starter.

Replit combines a browser IDE, hosting, and an agent. Starter is free with a daily allowance and one published app, which the Core comparison table lists as 30-day. Core is the individual paid plan: the pricing page shows $20 and $18/mo billed annually, so the card stays verify. Agent work splits into Free Mode and paid Power or Max modes that spend credits.

Cheapest paid plan the ranking counts: Core at $20/mo, marked verify.

Best for:
- Learning by building a web app, script, or simple browser game in one place
- People who want an IDE without installing one
- A project that needs hosting and a database next to the agent

Not great for:
- Native mobile apps
- Large private codebases you already maintain elsewhere
- Anyone who needs a precise monthly price before the pricing page is re-checked

Free plan (Starter): Daily Agent credits and Free Mode with a daily cap, a built-in database, and one published project. The pricing page does not state one universal credit number.

Plans:
- Starter (individual): Free, verified. Daily Agent allowance and Free Mode with a daily cap. One published app, listed as 30-day on the Core comparison table. Built-in database. Exact daily credit count is not a single published number.
  The 30-day publish window is on the Core plan comparison table. The daily credit count is still not one published number.
- Core (individual): $20/mo, marked verify. $20 toward more powerful models. The pricing page listed up to 30 hours of Free Mode chat and up to 60 projects on Free Mode. Credits do not roll over.
  On 2026-10-19 the pricing page showed $18/mo billed annually next to $20. The page still mixes the subscription price, the annual rate, and the $20 credit line.
  Core docs list 1 active background task. The pricing page on 2026-10-19 did not print a parallel-task count. The $20 subscription figure is used for matching and marked verify because the page layout mixes it with the annual rate and the credit line.
- Pro (individual): $100/mo, marked verify. $100 toward more powerful models, more Free Mode usage, up to 15 collaborators, and database rollback up to 28 days. Docs say unused credits roll for two months.
  The pricing page showed $90/mo billed annually on 2026-10-19.
  The $100 list price is consistent. The $90 annual rate is marked verify with the rest of this card because the pricing page markup is easy to misread.

When the limit hits: Starter keeps a daily cap. Core and Pro Free Mode allowances reset every five hours and also have weekly limits, per Replit's plan docs. Core credits reset each billing cycle and do not roll over. Pro credits roll for two months.
- Stay in Free Mode for everyday agent work. Power and Max spend credits and Replit asks before a paid action.
- On Starter, wait for the daily reset or publish only the one included app.
- Core is the next step for Plan mode, more than one published app, and credits toward stronger models. Re-check the live monthly price before you subscribe.
- If Core credits expire unused every month, that is expected. Rollover starts on Pro.
- Set a usage budget in Replit before you leave Free Mode, so a long agent run cannot surprise you.

Last updated: October 19, 2026.

## v0

[v0](https://fitbuildai.com/tools/v0)

A browser UI builder for React interfaces and landing pages.

v0 generates UI and can deploy it to Vercel. Free is 7 messages a day. The paid plan new users can buy is Plus at $30 per user, with $30 of monthly credits. A $20 Premium plan exists in the docs and is being sunset for new users, so it is not treated as a plan you can start today.

Cheapest paid plan the ranking counts: Plus at $30/user/mo.

Best for:
- Landing pages and React UI
- A frontend you will deploy on Vercel
- People who want to see a design before they think about a backend

Not great for:
- A full SaaS with accounts, billing, and a database as the main job
- Native mobile apps and games
- Repo-wide refactors in an existing backend

Free plan (Free): 7 messages a day, plus a credit offer that depends on the account. New signups under the one-time offer get $5 once. Existing free users may still have $5 a month. Check billing settings.

Plans:
- Free (individual): Free, verified. 7 messages a day. Credit grant is the current offer: $5 once for new accounts on the one-time offer, or $5 a month for existing free users. Confirm which offer your account has.
  The message cap is documented. The credit offer is account-specific, which is called out in the limits rather than guessed.
- Premium (individual): $20/mo, verified. $20 of credits a month. v0's docs say Premium is being sunset and is no longer available to new users.
  Shown so you do not plan on it. Excluded from budget matching for that reason.
- Plus (individual): $30/user/mo, verified. $30 of included monthly credits per user and $2 of daily credits on login. Extra credits can be purchased. Team sharing and centralized billing.
  This is the paid plan the pricing page offers new users. On 2026-10-19 that page showed $30/user/month with $90 struck through beside it. The docs also list Plus at $30/user/month.
- Business (team): $100/user/mo, verified. $30 of monthly credits per user, $2 daily login credits, and training opt-out by default.
  A privacy and team plan, not a larger credit bucket than Plus.

When the limit hits: Free is capped at 7 messages a day. Paid plans are credit-based. Unused monthly credits roll one cycle and expire after 65 days. Purchased credits expire after one year and need an active paid plan to spend.
- On Free, wait until the next day. Seven messages go quickly if you regenerate the whole page.
- Be specific so you spend fewer generations. v0's own docs say vague prompts burn credits.
- Plus at $30/user is the current team-and-individual step up for new users, with $30 of monthly credits and $2 of daily login credits.
- Buy more credits on Plus or Business when the monthly grant is gone. Generation pauses at zero.
- ChatGPT Plus or Pro can cover some eligible model responses inside v0, and each of those requests still charges a small v0 platform fee. If the ChatGPT allowance runs out, v0 pauses. It does not silently switch those responses onto v0 credits.

Last updated: October 19, 2026.

## Windsurf

[Windsurf](https://fitbuildai.com/tools/windsurf)

The editor formerly called Windsurf, now sold as Devin Desktop.

Windsurf was acquired by Cognition and is sold as Devin Desktop. windsurf.com redirects into Devin. Plans are Free, Pro at $20, and Max at $200, with daily and weekly quotas Cognition does not publish as a prompt count. Pick this when you want an editor agent and you are comparing it with Cursor, not when you want the old Windsurf credit packs.

Cheapest paid plan the ranking counts: Pro at $20/mo.

Best for:
- An editor agent at $20 with frontier models and cloud agents
- Developers comparing Windsurf with Cursor's current plans
- People who still search for Windsurf and need the current product name

Not great for:
- Anyone expecting the old Windsurf credit tables (those plans are gone)
- No-code browser app building
- A published quota you can budget to the prompt

Free plan (Free): A light agent quota, limited model access, unlimited inline edits, and unlimited Tab. Cognition does not publish the quota as a number.

Plans:
- Free (individual): Free, verified. Light agent quota, limited models, unlimited inline edits, and unlimited Tab. Quota size is not published.
  Price and qualitative limits are from the Devin pricing page. The missing number is stated, not invented.
- Pro (individual): $20/mo, verified. Daily and weekly quotas, frontier models, free use of SWE-2, Devin Cloud, and extra usage at API pricing. One user. Quota size is not published.
  Devin docs describe Pro as the entry individual plan at $20/mo. The pricing page lists free use of SWE-2 and does not print an end date for it.
- Max (individual): $200/mo, verified. Everything in Pro with a significantly larger weekly quota and no daily cap. The quota multiple is not published as a number.
  The no-daily-cap rule is on Devin's self-serve plan docs. The pricing page says significantly higher quotas and does not print a number.
- Teams (team): $80/mo minimum, verified. $80/mo minimum, then $40/mo per full seat. Each full seat has its own quota. Up to 200 users.
  Not an individual plan. The $80 is the team minimum, not a per-person price.

When the limit hits: Pro has daily and weekly quotas. Max has a weekly quota and no daily cap. Cognition does not publish the size. Past the quota, paid plans can buy extra usage at API pricing.
- Check the in-app quota before you assume you need a new tool. Pro resets daily and weekly. Max has no daily cap, so a heavy afternoon may not clear overnight.
- Buy extra usage at API pricing on Pro or Max if the included quota is gone and the task is urgent.
- Move from Pro ($20) to Max ($200) for what Cognition calls significantly higher quotas.
- Free cannot buy on-demand credits. Upgrade to Pro, or to Teams if more than one person needs the subscription.
- If you need a published credit count, Copilot prints one. Current Cursor plans do not publish a prompt count.

Last updated: October 19, 2026.

## Google Antigravity

[Google Antigravity](https://fitbuildai.com/tools/google-antigravity)

A free agent IDE, with higher quotas on Google AI Pro and Ultra.

Antigravity is Google's agent-first coding app and CLI. The individual plan is $0 with a weekly agent quota, unlimited Tab, and unlimited Command requests. Higher quotas come from Google AI Pro ($19.99) and Google AI Ultra ($99.99 or $199.99), which are Google One plans, not prices printed on the Antigravity pricing page itself.

Cheapest paid plan the ranking counts: Google AI Pro at $19.99/mo.

Best for:
- Trying an editor agent without a subscription
- Gemini-first coding on a weekly quota
- A $20-ish step up via Google AI Pro if the free week runs out

Not great for:
- A browser builder that hosts the app for you
- No-code landing pages
- Anyone who needs third-party models on the free or Pro plan (Antigravity docs put those on Ultra)

Free plan (Individual): Free. Unlimited Tab completions and Command requests, Gemini models, and a weekly agent quota. The quota is not a published prompt count. It refreshes weekly, not every five hours.

Plans:
- Individual (individual): Free, verified. Unlimited Tab and Command requests. Weekly agent quota. Gemini models, including Gemini 3.8 Flash, which the plans doc names as a core agent model. No published prompt count.
  The Antigravity pricing page lists this at $0/mo.
- Google AI Pro (individual): $19.99/mo, verified. Higher Antigravity quota, refreshed every five hours until a weekly limit. AI credits can cover overage if you allow it. Also a Google One plan with storage and other Google AI benefits.
  The dollar amount is the Google AI Pro price on Google One. Antigravity's own pricing page describes the higher limits and does not print $19.99.
- Google AI Ultra 5x (individual): $99.99/mo, verified. Highest Antigravity quota class, refreshed every five hours, plus third-party models. Google labels this 5x Pro Gemini usage.
  Price is from Google One and Gemini subscription pages, which are the plans Antigravity docs say raise the quota.
- Google AI Ultra 20x (individual): $199.99/mo, verified. The highest weekly limits Google documents for these plans, labeled 20x Pro Gemini usage.
  Same source split as the 5x tier: quota rules on Antigravity docs, price on Google One.

When the limit hits: Free quota refreshes weekly. Google AI Pro refreshes every five hours until a weekly limit. Ultra refreshes every five hours and has the highest weekly limits. Prompt counts are not published because heavier tasks spend more quota.
- On the free plan, wait for the weekly refresh. There is no credit overage.
- Subscribe to Google AI Pro ($19.99/mo) for a higher quota every five hours until the weekly cap, plus the option to spend AI credits after the baseline.
- Set AI Credit Overages to Never if you do not want Pro or Ultra to bill credits automatically when a model quota hits zero.
- Ultra ($99.99 or $199.99) is the step for the highest quota and for third-party models.
- Bring-your-own-key is not supported. You cannot route around the quota with a personal API key.

Last updated: October 19, 2026.

## Kiro

[Kiro](https://fitbuildai.com/tools/kiro)

An agentic IDE that turns a prompt into a spec, then into a diff.

Kiro is AWS's agentic IDE, with a CLI and a paid web app that runs tasks in a cloud sandbox. Free is 50 credits a month. Paid plans are Pro at $20 (1,000 credits), Pro+ at $40 (2,000), Pro Max at $100 (5,000), and Power at $200 (10,000). Plan credits reset monthly and do not roll over. Paid plans can buy more at $0.04 a credit. It is a spec-and-diff tool for a repo, not a form that publishes a site.

Cheapest paid plan the ranking counts: Pro at $20/user/mo.

Best for:
- A web app or automation you will keep in a repo and review as a diff
- Developers who want requirements and tasks written down before the agent edits
- A published monthly credit number, instead of an unpublished quota

Not great for:
- Publishing a landing page without looking at code
- A native iOS or Android app (the Kiro mobile app only steers sessions)
- Games that need a scene editor
- Anyone who needs the free 50 credits to last a month of daily agent work

Free plan (Free): 50 credits a month on the perpetual free tier, with Claude Sonnet 4.5 and open-weight models, subject to rate limits. Add-on credits are not available. Kiro Web is not on this plan.

Plans:
- Free (individual): Free, verified. 50 credits a month. Claude Sonnet 4.5 and open-weight models such as Qwen3 Coder Next, DeepSeek 3.2, and MiniMax M2.1, with rate limits. No add-on credits. Kiro Web is not included.
  The 50-credit free allowance is on the pricing page and the billing docs. The free tier is not offered on Kiro Enterprise or in AWS GovCloud.
- Pro (individual): $20/user/mo, verified. 1,000 credits a month. Premium models, including Auto, Claude Sonnet 5, and Claude Opus 5, where those models are available. Add-on credits at $0.04. Kiro Web uses the same credits.
  Price is on kiro.dev/pricing. The credit count is on the billing docs. Prices exclude tax. A first upgrade with social login or Builder ID gets a $20 credit toward the subscription, prorated for the partial month.
- Pro+ (individual): $40/user/mo, verified. 2,000 credits a month, with the same paid-plan model access and add-on credits as Pro.
  Price on the pricing page. Credit count on the billing docs.
- Pro Max (individual): $100/user/mo, verified. 5,000 credits a month. The same feature set as Power, including specs, custom subagents, powers, and hooks.
  The $100 price and the 5,000-credit count are on the pricing page's tier list, the billing docs, and Kiro's Pro Max announcement.
- Power (individual): $200/user/mo, verified. 10,000 credits a month, the largest self-serve pool, plus add-on credits at $0.04.
  Price on the pricing page. Credit count on the billing docs. AWS GovCloud is approximately 20% higher and has no free tier. That regional markup is not a separate dollar row here.
- Enterprise (team): Contact sales, marked verify. Centralized billing, SSO, usage analytics, and enterprise security controls. Overages, if an admin turns them on, are $0.04 per credit. No published seat price.
  The pricing page describes the plan and does not print a dollar amount, so this row stays Verify and out of budget matching. Each developer still needs a subscription. Organizations over 500 users are pointed to sales.

When the limit hits: Plan credits renew at the start of the next billing cycle. Paid subscriptions are processed on the 1st of each calendar month. Unused plan credits do not roll over. Add-on credits, which are paid plans only, last 12 months.
- On Free, wait for the monthly reset. Add-on credits cannot be bought on this tier, and Kiro Web is not included.
- On a paid plan, buy add-on credits at $0.04 each. Packs start at $5 for 125 credits and go up to $100. Plan credits are spent first.
- Move up a tier when add-on packs are becoming the real bill. Pro+ is $40, Pro Max is $100, and Power is $200.
- Switch the model to Auto, or to a cheaper open-weight model, when a frontier model is burning the pool. The pricing page's own example is Sonnet 4.6 at 1.3x the credit cost of Auto.
- The first paid upgrade with social login or AWS Builder ID includes a $20 credit toward that subscription. It is prorated, and it is not a permanent discount.

Last updated: October 19, 2026.

## Jules

[Jules](https://fitbuildai.com/tools/jules)

An async agent that takes a GitHub task and opens a pull request.

Jules is Google's asynchronous coding agent. You point it at a GitHub repo, it works in a cloud VM, and it opens a pull request. The free plan is 15 tasks per rolling 24 hours and 3 at once, on Gemini 2.5 Pro. Jules in Pro is included with Google AI Pro at $19.99 and raises that to 100 tasks and 15 at once. Google AI Ultra is $99.99 or $199.99. Jules' own plan table publishes one Ultra row, 300 tasks and 60 concurrent tasks, and does not say which of those two prices that row belongs to. Paid Jules access requires a personal @gmail.com Google AI plan. Jules does not host the app.

Cheapest paid plan the ranking counts: Google AI Pro (Jules in Pro) at $19.99/mo.

Best for:
- Bug fixes, version bumps, and small features on a repo you already have
- Handing off a task and reviewing the pull request later
- A free daily allowance with a published task count

Not great for:
- A hosted app you want to see running without a GitHub repo
- No-code landing pages
- Native mobile apps and games
- A Workspace or non-Gmail account that needs a paid Jules upgrade (Jules says that path is not available yet)

Free plan (Jules): 15 tasks per rolling 24 hours, 3 concurrent, on Gemini 2.5 Pro. Jules describes this plan as evaluating the agent on real work. It does not host the project.

Plans:
- Jules (individual): Free, verified. 15 tasks per rolling 24 hours, 3 concurrent tasks, Gemini 2.5 Pro. Jules' own label for this row is evaluating the agent on real work.
  Task counts are on jules.google and the usage-limits doc. Neither page prints a dollar price because this row is free.
- Google AI Pro (Jules in Pro) (individual): $19.99/mo, verified. 100 tasks per rolling 24 hours, 15 concurrent tasks, and higher access to the latest model. The Jules plan table says that starts with Gemini 3 Pro. A March 9, 2026 Jules changelog says Gemini 3.1 Pro replaced Gemini 3 Pro as the default for Pro users.
  Jules docs say Jules in Pro is included with Google AI Pro. The $19.99 price is the Google AI Pro price on Google One, which also includes storage and other Google AI products. Google AI Plus at $4.99 is not listed by Jules as an upgrade. Google One only labels Plus Jules limits as Limited, so it is not a paid Jules row.
- Google AI Ultra 5x (Jules in Ultra) (individual): $99.99/mo, verified. Google One labels Jules task limits, concurrent limits, and latest-model access as Higher than Pro. Jules' plan table publishes one Ultra row of 300 tasks per rolling 24 hours and 60 concurrent tasks, and does not say whether that row is this 5x plan, the 20x plan, or both.
  The $99.99 price is Google AI Ultra 5x on Google One. The task number is left off this card so a single Ultra row is not pasted onto both prices.
- Google AI Ultra 20x (Jules in Ultra) (individual): $199.99/mo, verified. Google One labels Jules task limits, concurrent limits, and latest-model access as Highest. The same Jules Ultra row of 300 tasks and 60 concurrent tasks is not assigned to this price either.
  The $199.99 price is Google AI Ultra 20x on Google One. Jules docs describe one Ultra benefit and one set of task numbers.

When the limit hits: Task limits are a rolling 24 hours, not midnight. Concurrent-task caps apply at the same time. Family-plan members each have their own limits. They are not pooled.
- When the new-task button turns off, keep reviewing tasks that are already running. History stays available.
- Wait for the rolling 24-hour window. Starting another account is not the path this product documents.
- Jules in Pro is the daily-coding step: 100 tasks and 15 concurrent. It comes with Google AI Pro at $19.99 a month, which is a whole Google AI plan, not a Jules-only line item.
- Google AI Ultra is the step past that, at $99.99 (5x) or $199.99 (20x). Confirm which Ultra price the checkout shows, and what Jules displays for that account, before you pay. The 300-task row is not assigned to one of those prices on the public pages.
- Paid Jules plans currently require a personal Google Account ending in @gmail.com. You also have to be 18 or older. A Workspace account does not have this upgrade yet.

Last updated: October 19, 2026.

## Amp

[Amp](https://fitbuildai.com/tools/amp)

A coding agent you can run free on your own machine, or in Amp's cloud.

Amp is a coding agent you use on the web, in the Mac and iOS apps, or in the terminal. Hobby is free when you bring a model subscription or key and run on your own computer. Amp's cloud machines, called orbs, are pay-as-you-go on Hobby. Megawatt is $20 a month for 45,000 orb minutes and $20 of Amp credits. Gigawatt is $200 a month for 480,000 orb minutes and $200 of credits. A team workspace has no extra fee. Students and teachers can get Megawatt for $10, and that price is not the general floor.

Cheapest paid plan the ranking counts: Megawatt at $20/mo.

Best for:
- A repo you want an agent to work on in parallel, including while your laptop is closed
- People who already pay for ChatGPT or Claude and want to use that subscription inside an agent
- Developers who can review agent output and do not need a hosted app builder

Not great for:
- A no-code landing page or a hosted app from a form
- A free month of Amp-paid model usage (Hobby includes neither orb minutes nor Amp credits)
- Native mobile apps and games
- Anyone budgeting the $10 education price without being a student or teacher

Free plan (Hobby): Free to Amp if you bring your own model subscription or key and run on your own machine. Cloud orbs are pay-as-you-go. Hobby includes no orb minutes and no Amp credits.

Plans:
- Hobby (individual): Free, verified. All product features. No monthly fee. Pay-as-you-go orbs, or your own runners at no Amp charge. Linked ChatGPT, Claude, and other subscriptions, and bring-your-own-key, with no Amp token fees or limits. No included orb minutes and no included Amp credits.
  The Hobby card is on ampcode.com/pricing. Standard orb rates, if you do use cloud machines, are on the orb sizes page and start at $0.08 an hour for a1.tiny.
- Megawatt (individual): $20/mo, verified. 45,000 minutes of orb time and $20 of Amp credits, then more credits at provider list price. Unlimited public and private repositories, and your own portal domains. Soft hosting limits on the card are 1 GB of repository storage and 10 GB of monthly transfer.
  This is the Individual price shown on the default pricing tab. Included usage does not roll over. The $20 of credits is the amount the pricing card prints for this tier.
- Megawatt (education) (individual): $10/mo, verified. The same Megawatt allowance, at $10 a month for students and teachers. The pricing card shows $10 of included Amp credits when the education discount is applied.
  The pricing FAQ says students and teachers can get Megawatt for $10 per month. Left out of budget matching so a general under-$10 question cannot be won by a discount most readers cannot buy.
- Gigawatt (individual): $200/mo, verified. 480,000 minutes of orb time, which is the Gigawatt tab's minute figure, and $200 of Amp credits. The underlying allowance is 1,000 hours of a1.xxlarge. a1.3xlarge orbs are limited to Gigawatt and Enterprise. Soft hosting limits are 10 GB of repository storage and 100 GB of monthly transfer.
  The $200 price is the Gigawatt tier on ampcode.com/pricing. The default tab is Megawatt, so the $200 card is the other Individual tab. A note on the orb details says 10× limits for Gigawatt.
- Teams (team): No extra charge, verified. A workspace has no extra fee. Members can be on Hobby, Megawatt, or Gigawatt. Shared threads, billing, and pooled credits. SAML or OIDC SSO needs at least one member on a paid tier.
  Not an individual plan. People still pay for their own paid tier, if they have one.
- Enterprise (team): Custom, marked verify. Pooled credits, no paid user seats, SCIM, spend limits, audit logs, and higher quotas. The public pages do not print a dollar price. Enterprise is the tier Amp excludes from the no-token-fee promise.
  No published price, so this row stays Verify and out of budget matching. Contact Amp for the number.

When the limit hits: Included Megawatt and Gigawatt usage resets at the end of the monthly billing period and does not roll over. Purchased credits expire 12 months after you buy them. A paused orb costs nothing. Amp pauses an idle orb 5 minutes after the agent stops, or 20 minutes after your last interaction, whichever is later.
- On Hobby, use your own runner if the bill you are avoiding is orb time. Model limits on a linked ChatGPT or Claude subscription are that vendor's cap, not an Amp cap.
- Buy Amp credits if you want Amp to pay the model bill. Individuals are charged the provider's API price with no markup. Credits do not require a paid tier.
- When Megawatt's 45,000 orb minutes are gone, wait for the monthly reset, buy credits, or move to Gigawatt.
- Cancel in user settings. The paid tier stays active until the end of the current monthly period.
- The $10 Megawatt price is the education discount for students and teachers. It is not the price the ranker uses for a general $10 budget.

Last updated: October 19, 2026.

# Comparisons

## Amp vs Bolt.new

[Amp vs Bolt.new](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/amp-vs-bolt)

Amp: Web app, Mac and iOS apps, CLI, and cloud machines or your own runners. Bolt.new: Browser builder with a code view and hosting.
If you do not want to read code, Bolt.new is the closer fit.
Amp has the lower verified individual paid plan: Megawatt at $20/mo.
For a website or landing page, Bolt.new is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Amp is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Amp if you want a repo you want an agent to work on in parallel, including while your laptop is closed.
Pick Bolt.new if you want a first web app or landing page you want to see running today.

## Amp vs Claude Code

[Amp vs Claude Code](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/amp-vs-claude-code)

Amp: Web app, Mac and iOS apps, CLI, and cloud machines or your own runners. Claude Code: Terminal agent, plus the Claude apps that share one usage pool.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Amp if you want a repo you want an agent to work on in parallel, including while your laptop is closed.
Pick Claude Code if you want an agent in the terminal on an existing repo.

## Amp vs Cursor

[Amp vs Cursor](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/amp-vs-cursor)

Amp: Web app, Mac and iOS apps, CLI, and cloud machines or your own runners. Cursor: Desktop editor, CLI, and cloud agents.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Cursor has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $8/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Amp if you want a repo you want an agent to work on in parallel, including while your laptop is closed.
Pick Cursor if you want a web app or SaaS you will keep editing in a repo.

## Amp vs GitHub Copilot

[Amp vs GitHub Copilot](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/amp-vs-github-copilot)

Amp: Web app, Mac and iOS apps, CLI, and cloud machines or your own runners. GitHub Copilot: IDE extension, github.com, agent, and CLI.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
GitHub Copilot has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $10/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Amp if you want a repo you want an agent to work on in parallel, including while your laptop is closed.
Pick GitHub Copilot if you want an assistant inside VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.

## Amp vs Google Antigravity

[Amp vs Google Antigravity](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/amp-vs-google-antigravity)

Amp: Web app, Mac and iOS apps, CLI, and cloud machines or your own runners. Google Antigravity: Desktop agent IDE and CLI.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Google Antigravity has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro at $19.99/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Amp if you want a repo you want an agent to work on in parallel, including while your laptop is closed.
Pick Google Antigravity if you are trying an editor agent without a subscription.

## Amp vs Jules

[Amp vs Jules](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/amp-vs-jules)

Amp: Web app, Mac and iOS apps, CLI, and cloud machines or your own runners. Jules: Browser agent that opens pull requests on GitHub.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Jules has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro (Jules in Pro) at $19.99/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Amp if you want a repo you want an agent to work on in parallel, including while your laptop is closed.
Pick Jules if you want bug fixes, version bumps, and small features on a repo you already have.

## Amp vs Kiro

[Amp vs Kiro](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/amp-vs-kiro)

Amp: Web app, Mac and iOS apps, CLI, and cloud machines or your own runners. Kiro: Desktop IDE, CLI, and a paid web app for cloud sessions.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Amp if you want a repo you want an agent to work on in parallel, including while your laptop is closed.
Pick Kiro if you want a web app or automation you will keep in a repo and review as a diff.

## Amp vs Lovable

[Amp vs Lovable](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/amp-vs-lovable)

Amp: Web app, Mac and iOS apps, CLI, and cloud machines or your own runners. Lovable: Browser app builder with hosting, Git sync, and code export on paid plans.
If you do not want to read code, Lovable is the closer fit.
Amp has the lower verified individual paid plan: Megawatt at $20/mo.
For a website or landing page, Lovable is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Amp is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Amp if you want a repo you want an agent to work on in parallel, including while your laptop is closed.
Pick Lovable if you want a web app or SaaS you want to describe in the browser.

## Amp vs OpenAI Codex

[Amp vs OpenAI Codex](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/amp-vs-openai-codex)

Amp: Web app, Mac and iOS apps, CLI, and cloud machines or your own runners. OpenAI Codex: Desktop app, CLI, and IDE, included with ChatGPT.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Amp if you want a repo you want an agent to work on in parallel, including while your laptop is closed.
Pick OpenAI Codex if you already pay for ChatGPT and want the coding agent in that allowance.

## Amp vs Replit

[Amp vs Replit](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/amp-vs-replit)

Amp: Web app, Mac and iOS apps, CLI, and cloud machines or your own runners. Replit: Browser IDE with Agent, hosting, and a database.
If you do not want to read code, Replit is the closer fit.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Amp if you want a repo you want an agent to work on in parallel, including while your laptop is closed.
Pick Replit if you are learning by building a web app, script, or simple browser game in one place.

## Amp vs v0

[Amp vs v0](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/amp-vs-v0)

Amp: Web app, Mac and iOS apps, CLI, and cloud machines or your own runners. v0: Browser UI generator with deploy to Vercel.
If you do not want to read code, v0 is the closer fit.
Amp has the lower verified individual paid plan: Megawatt at $20/mo.
For a web app or SaaS, Amp is the stronger match in our weights.
For a website or landing page, v0 is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Amp is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Amp if you want a repo you want an agent to work on in parallel, including while your laptop is closed.
Pick v0 if you are landing pages and React UI.

## Amp vs Windsurf

[Amp vs Windsurf](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/amp-vs-windsurf)

Amp: Web app, Mac and iOS apps, CLI, and cloud machines or your own runners. Windsurf: Devin Desktop editor, CLI, and Devin Cloud on paid plans.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Amp if you want a repo you want an agent to work on in parallel, including while your laptop is closed.
Pick Windsurf if you want an editor agent at $20 with frontier models and cloud agents.

## Bolt.new vs Claude Code

[Bolt.new vs Claude Code](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/bolt-vs-claude-code)

Bolt.new: Browser builder with a code view and hosting. Claude Code: Terminal agent, plus the Claude apps that share one usage pool.
If you do not want to read code, Bolt.new is the closer fit.
Claude Code has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $20/mo.
For a website or landing page, Bolt.new is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Claude Code is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Bolt.new if you want a first web app or landing page you want to see running today.
Pick Claude Code if you want an agent in the terminal on an existing repo.

## Bolt.new vs Cursor

[Bolt.new vs Cursor](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/bolt-vs-cursor)

Bolt.new: Browser builder with a code view and hosting. Cursor: Desktop editor, CLI, and cloud agents.
If you do not want to read code, Bolt.new is the closer fit.
Cursor has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $8/mo.
For a website or landing page, Bolt.new is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Cursor is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Bolt.new if you want a first web app or landing page you want to see running today.
Pick Cursor if you want a web app or SaaS you will keep editing in a repo.

## Bolt.new vs GitHub Copilot

[Bolt.new vs GitHub Copilot](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/bolt-vs-github-copilot)

Bolt.new: Browser builder with a code view and hosting. GitHub Copilot: IDE extension, github.com, agent, and CLI.
If you do not want to read code, Bolt.new is the closer fit.
GitHub Copilot has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $10/mo.
For a website or landing page, Bolt.new is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, GitHub Copilot is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Bolt.new if you want a first web app or landing page you want to see running today.
Pick GitHub Copilot if you want an assistant inside VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.

## Bolt.new vs Google Antigravity

[Bolt.new vs Google Antigravity](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/bolt-vs-google-antigravity)

Bolt.new: Browser builder with a code view and hosting. Google Antigravity: Desktop agent IDE and CLI.
If you do not want to read code, Bolt.new is the closer fit.
Google Antigravity has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro at $19.99/mo.
For a website or landing page, Bolt.new is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Google Antigravity is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Bolt.new if you want a first web app or landing page you want to see running today.
Pick Google Antigravity if you are trying an editor agent without a subscription.

## Bolt.new vs Jules

[Bolt.new vs Jules](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/bolt-vs-jules)

Bolt.new: Browser builder with a code view and hosting. Jules: Browser agent that opens pull requests on GitHub.
If you do not want to read code, Bolt.new is the closer fit.
Jules has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro (Jules in Pro) at $19.99/mo.
For a website or landing page, Bolt.new is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Jules is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Bolt.new if you want a first web app or landing page you want to see running today.
Pick Jules if you want bug fixes, version bumps, and small features on a repo you already have.

## Bolt.new vs Kiro

[Bolt.new vs Kiro](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/bolt-vs-kiro)

Bolt.new: Browser builder with a code view and hosting. Kiro: Desktop IDE, CLI, and a paid web app for cloud sessions.
If you do not want to read code, Bolt.new is the closer fit.
Kiro has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $20/user/mo.
For a website or landing page, Bolt.new is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Kiro is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Bolt.new if you want a first web app or landing page you want to see running today.
Pick Kiro if you want a web app or automation you will keep in a repo and review as a diff.

## Bolt.new vs Lovable

[Bolt.new vs Lovable](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/bolt-vs-lovable)

Bolt.new: Browser builder with a code view and hosting. Lovable: Browser app builder with hosting, Git sync, and code export on paid plans.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Bolt.new if you want a first web app or landing page you want to see running today.
Pick Lovable if you want a web app or SaaS you want to describe in the browser.

## Bolt.new vs OpenAI Codex

[Bolt.new vs OpenAI Codex](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/bolt-vs-openai-codex)

Bolt.new: Browser builder with a code view and hosting. OpenAI Codex: Desktop app, CLI, and IDE, included with ChatGPT.
If you do not want to read code, Bolt.new is the closer fit.
OpenAI Codex has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $20/mo.
For a website or landing page, Bolt.new is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, OpenAI Codex is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Bolt.new if you want a first web app or landing page you want to see running today.
Pick OpenAI Codex if you already pay for ChatGPT and want the coding agent in that allowance.

## Bolt.new vs Replit

[Bolt.new vs Replit](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/bolt-vs-replit)

Bolt.new: Browser builder with a code view and hosting. Replit: Browser IDE with Agent, hosting, and a database.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Replit has the lower verified individual paid plan: Core at $20/mo. That price is marked verify.
For a game, Replit is the stronger match in our weights.
For a website or landing page, Bolt.new is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Replit is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Bolt.new if you want a first web app or landing page you want to see running today.
Pick Replit if you are learning by building a web app, script, or simple browser game in one place.

## Bolt.new vs v0

[Bolt.new vs v0](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/bolt-vs-v0)

Bolt.new: Browser builder with a code view and hosting. v0: Browser UI generator with deploy to Vercel.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Bolt.new has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $25/mo. That price is marked verify.
For a web app or SaaS, Bolt.new is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Bolt.new if you want a first web app or landing page you want to see running today.
Pick v0 if you are landing pages and React UI.

## Bolt.new vs Windsurf

[Bolt.new vs Windsurf](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/bolt-vs-windsurf)

Bolt.new: Browser builder with a code view and hosting. Windsurf: Devin Desktop editor, CLI, and Devin Cloud on paid plans.
If you do not want to read code, Bolt.new is the closer fit.
Windsurf has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $20/mo.
For a website or landing page, Bolt.new is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Windsurf is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Bolt.new if you want a first web app or landing page you want to see running today.
Pick Windsurf if you want an editor agent at $20 with frontier models and cloud agents.

## Claude Code vs Cursor

[Claude Code vs Cursor](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/claude-code-vs-cursor)

Claude Code: Terminal agent, plus the Claude apps that share one usage pool. Cursor: Desktop editor, CLI, and cloud agents.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Cursor has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $8/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Claude Code if you want an agent in the terminal on an existing repo.
Pick Cursor if you want a web app or SaaS you will keep editing in a repo.

## Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot

[Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/claude-code-vs-github-copilot)

Claude Code: Terminal agent, plus the Claude apps that share one usage pool. GitHub Copilot: IDE extension, github.com, agent, and CLI.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
GitHub Copilot has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $10/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Claude Code if you want an agent in the terminal on an existing repo.
Pick GitHub Copilot if you want an assistant inside VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.

## Claude Code vs Google Antigravity

[Claude Code vs Google Antigravity](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/claude-code-vs-google-antigravity)

Claude Code: Terminal agent, plus the Claude apps that share one usage pool. Google Antigravity: Desktop agent IDE and CLI.
If you do not want to read code, Google Antigravity is the closer fit.
Google Antigravity has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro at $19.99/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Claude Code if you want an agent in the terminal on an existing repo.
Pick Google Antigravity if you are trying an editor agent without a subscription.

## Claude Code vs Jules

[Claude Code vs Jules](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/claude-code-vs-jules)

Claude Code: Terminal agent, plus the Claude apps that share one usage pool. Jules: Browser agent that opens pull requests on GitHub.
If you do not want to read code, Jules is the closer fit.
Jules has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro (Jules in Pro) at $19.99/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Claude Code if you want an agent in the terminal on an existing repo.
Pick Jules if you want bug fixes, version bumps, and small features on a repo you already have.

## Claude Code vs Kiro

[Claude Code vs Kiro](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/claude-code-vs-kiro)

Claude Code: Terminal agent, plus the Claude apps that share one usage pool. Kiro: Desktop IDE, CLI, and a paid web app for cloud sessions.
If you do not want to read code, Kiro is the closer fit.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Claude Code if you want an agent in the terminal on an existing repo.
Pick Kiro if you want a web app or automation you will keep in a repo and review as a diff.

## Claude Code vs Lovable

[Claude Code vs Lovable](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/claude-code-vs-lovable)

Claude Code: Terminal agent, plus the Claude apps that share one usage pool. Lovable: Browser app builder with hosting, Git sync, and code export on paid plans.
If you do not want to read code, Lovable is the closer fit.
Claude Code has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $20/mo.
For a website or landing page, Lovable is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Claude Code is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Claude Code if you want an agent in the terminal on an existing repo.
Pick Lovable if you want a web app or SaaS you want to describe in the browser.

## Claude Code vs OpenAI Codex

[Claude Code vs OpenAI Codex](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/claude-code-vs-openai-codex)

Claude Code: Terminal agent, plus the Claude apps that share one usage pool. OpenAI Codex: Desktop app, CLI, and IDE, included with ChatGPT.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Claude Code if you want an agent in the terminal on an existing repo.
Pick OpenAI Codex if you already pay for ChatGPT and want the coding agent in that allowance.

## Claude Code vs Replit

[Claude Code vs Replit](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/claude-code-vs-replit)

Claude Code: Terminal agent, plus the Claude apps that share one usage pool. Replit: Browser IDE with Agent, hosting, and a database.
If you do not want to read code, Replit is the closer fit.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Claude Code if you want an agent in the terminal on an existing repo.
Pick Replit if you are learning by building a web app, script, or simple browser game in one place.

## Claude Code vs v0

[Claude Code vs v0](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/claude-code-vs-v0)

Claude Code: Terminal agent, plus the Claude apps that share one usage pool. v0: Browser UI generator with deploy to Vercel.
If you do not want to read code, v0 is the closer fit.
Claude Code has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $20/mo.
For a web app or SaaS, Claude Code is the stronger match in our weights.
For a website or landing page, v0 is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Claude Code is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Claude Code if you want an agent in the terminal on an existing repo.
Pick v0 if you are landing pages and React UI.

## Claude Code vs Windsurf

[Claude Code vs Windsurf](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/claude-code-vs-windsurf)

Claude Code: Terminal agent, plus the Claude apps that share one usage pool. Windsurf: Devin Desktop editor, CLI, and Devin Cloud on paid plans.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Claude Code if you want an agent in the terminal on an existing repo.
Pick Windsurf if you want an editor agent at $20 with frontier models and cloud agents.

## Cursor vs GitHub Copilot

[Cursor vs GitHub Copilot](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/cursor-vs-github-copilot)

Cursor: Desktop editor, CLI, and cloud agents. GitHub Copilot: IDE extension, github.com, agent, and CLI.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Cursor has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $8/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Cursor if you want a web app or SaaS you will keep editing in a repo.
Pick GitHub Copilot if you want an assistant inside VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.

## Cursor vs Google Antigravity

[Cursor vs Google Antigravity](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/cursor-vs-google-antigravity)

Cursor: Desktop editor, CLI, and cloud agents. Google Antigravity: Desktop agent IDE and CLI.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Cursor has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $8/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Cursor if you want a web app or SaaS you will keep editing in a repo.
Pick Google Antigravity if you are trying an editor agent without a subscription.

## Cursor vs Jules

[Cursor vs Jules](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/cursor-vs-jules)

Cursor: Desktop editor, CLI, and cloud agents. Jules: Browser agent that opens pull requests on GitHub.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Cursor has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $8/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Cursor if you want a web app or SaaS you will keep editing in a repo.
Pick Jules if you want bug fixes, version bumps, and small features on a repo you already have.

## Cursor vs Kiro

[Cursor vs Kiro](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/cursor-vs-kiro)

Cursor: Desktop editor, CLI, and cloud agents. Kiro: Desktop IDE, CLI, and a paid web app for cloud sessions.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Cursor has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $8/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Cursor if you want a web app or SaaS you will keep editing in a repo.
Pick Kiro if you want a web app or automation you will keep in a repo and review as a diff.

## Cursor vs Lovable

[Cursor vs Lovable](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/cursor-vs-lovable)

Cursor: Desktop editor, CLI, and cloud agents. Lovable: Browser app builder with hosting, Git sync, and code export on paid plans.
If you do not want to read code, Lovable is the closer fit.
Cursor has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $8/mo.
For a website or landing page, Lovable is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Cursor is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Cursor if you want a web app or SaaS you will keep editing in a repo.
Pick Lovable if you want a web app or SaaS you want to describe in the browser.

## Cursor vs OpenAI Codex

[Cursor vs OpenAI Codex](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/cursor-vs-openai-codex)

Cursor: Desktop editor, CLI, and cloud agents. OpenAI Codex: Desktop app, CLI, and IDE, included with ChatGPT.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Cursor has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $8/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Cursor if you want a web app or SaaS you will keep editing in a repo.
Pick OpenAI Codex if you already pay for ChatGPT and want the coding agent in that allowance.

## Cursor vs Replit

[Cursor vs Replit](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/cursor-vs-replit)

Cursor: Desktop editor, CLI, and cloud agents. Replit: Browser IDE with Agent, hosting, and a database.
If you do not want to read code, Replit is the closer fit.
Cursor has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $8/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Cursor if you want a web app or SaaS you will keep editing in a repo.
Pick Replit if you are learning by building a web app, script, or simple browser game in one place.

## Cursor vs v0

[Cursor vs v0](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/cursor-vs-v0)

Cursor: Desktop editor, CLI, and cloud agents. v0: Browser UI generator with deploy to Vercel.
If you do not want to read code, v0 is the closer fit.
Cursor has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $8/mo.
For a web app or SaaS, Cursor is the stronger match in our weights.
For a website or landing page, v0 is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Cursor is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Cursor if you want a web app or SaaS you will keep editing in a repo.
Pick v0 if you are landing pages and React UI.

## Cursor vs Windsurf

[Cursor vs Windsurf](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/cursor-vs-windsurf)

Cursor: Desktop editor, CLI, and cloud agents. Windsurf: Devin Desktop editor, CLI, and Devin Cloud on paid plans.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Cursor has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $8/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Cursor if you want a web app or SaaS you will keep editing in a repo.
Pick Windsurf if you want an editor agent at $20 with frontier models and cloud agents.

## GitHub Copilot vs Google Antigravity

[GitHub Copilot vs Google Antigravity](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/github-copilot-vs-google-antigravity)

GitHub Copilot: IDE extension, github.com, agent, and CLI. Google Antigravity: Desktop agent IDE and CLI.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
GitHub Copilot has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $10/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick GitHub Copilot if you want an assistant inside VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.
Pick Google Antigravity if you are trying an editor agent without a subscription.

## GitHub Copilot vs Jules

[GitHub Copilot vs Jules](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/github-copilot-vs-jules)

GitHub Copilot: IDE extension, github.com, agent, and CLI. Jules: Browser agent that opens pull requests on GitHub.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
GitHub Copilot has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $10/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick GitHub Copilot if you want an assistant inside VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.
Pick Jules if you want bug fixes, version bumps, and small features on a repo you already have.

## GitHub Copilot vs Kiro

[GitHub Copilot vs Kiro](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/github-copilot-vs-kiro)

GitHub Copilot: IDE extension, github.com, agent, and CLI. Kiro: Desktop IDE, CLI, and a paid web app for cloud sessions.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
GitHub Copilot has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $10/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick GitHub Copilot if you want an assistant inside VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.
Pick Kiro if you want a web app or automation you will keep in a repo and review as a diff.

## GitHub Copilot vs Lovable

[GitHub Copilot vs Lovable](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/github-copilot-vs-lovable)

GitHub Copilot: IDE extension, github.com, agent, and CLI. Lovable: Browser app builder with hosting, Git sync, and code export on paid plans.
If you do not want to read code, Lovable is the closer fit.
GitHub Copilot has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $10/mo.
For a website or landing page, Lovable is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, GitHub Copilot is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick GitHub Copilot if you want an assistant inside VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.
Pick Lovable if you want a web app or SaaS you want to describe in the browser.

## GitHub Copilot vs OpenAI Codex

[GitHub Copilot vs OpenAI Codex](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/github-copilot-vs-openai-codex)

GitHub Copilot: IDE extension, github.com, agent, and CLI. OpenAI Codex: Desktop app, CLI, and IDE, included with ChatGPT.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
GitHub Copilot has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $10/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick GitHub Copilot if you want an assistant inside VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.
Pick OpenAI Codex if you already pay for ChatGPT and want the coding agent in that allowance.

## GitHub Copilot vs Replit

[GitHub Copilot vs Replit](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/github-copilot-vs-replit)

GitHub Copilot: IDE extension, github.com, agent, and CLI. Replit: Browser IDE with Agent, hosting, and a database.
If you do not want to read code, Replit is the closer fit.
GitHub Copilot has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $10/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick GitHub Copilot if you want an assistant inside VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.
Pick Replit if you are learning by building a web app, script, or simple browser game in one place.

## GitHub Copilot vs v0

[GitHub Copilot vs v0](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/github-copilot-vs-v0)

GitHub Copilot: IDE extension, github.com, agent, and CLI. v0: Browser UI generator with deploy to Vercel.
If you do not want to read code, v0 is the closer fit.
GitHub Copilot has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $10/mo.
For a website or landing page, v0 is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, GitHub Copilot is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick GitHub Copilot if you want an assistant inside VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.
Pick v0 if you are landing pages and React UI.

## GitHub Copilot vs Windsurf

[GitHub Copilot vs Windsurf](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/github-copilot-vs-windsurf)

GitHub Copilot: IDE extension, github.com, agent, and CLI. Windsurf: Devin Desktop editor, CLI, and Devin Cloud on paid plans.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
GitHub Copilot has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $10/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick GitHub Copilot if you want an assistant inside VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.
Pick Windsurf if you want an editor agent at $20 with frontier models and cloud agents.

## Google Antigravity vs Jules

[Google Antigravity vs Jules](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/google-antigravity-vs-jules)

Google Antigravity: Desktop agent IDE and CLI. Jules: Browser agent that opens pull requests on GitHub.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Google Antigravity if you are trying an editor agent without a subscription.
Pick Jules if you want bug fixes, version bumps, and small features on a repo you already have.

## Google Antigravity vs Kiro

[Google Antigravity vs Kiro](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/google-antigravity-vs-kiro)

Google Antigravity: Desktop agent IDE and CLI. Kiro: Desktop IDE, CLI, and a paid web app for cloud sessions.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Google Antigravity has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro at $19.99/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Google Antigravity if you are trying an editor agent without a subscription.
Pick Kiro if you want a web app or automation you will keep in a repo and review as a diff.

## Google Antigravity vs Lovable

[Google Antigravity vs Lovable](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/google-antigravity-vs-lovable)

Google Antigravity: Desktop agent IDE and CLI. Lovable: Browser app builder with hosting, Git sync, and code export on paid plans.
If you do not want to read code, Lovable is the closer fit.
Google Antigravity has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro at $19.99/mo.
For a website or landing page, Lovable is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Google Antigravity is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Google Antigravity if you are trying an editor agent without a subscription.
Pick Lovable if you want a web app or SaaS you want to describe in the browser.

## Google Antigravity vs OpenAI Codex

[Google Antigravity vs OpenAI Codex](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/google-antigravity-vs-openai-codex)

Google Antigravity: Desktop agent IDE and CLI. OpenAI Codex: Desktop app, CLI, and IDE, included with ChatGPT.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Google Antigravity has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro at $19.99/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Google Antigravity if you are trying an editor agent without a subscription.
Pick OpenAI Codex if you already pay for ChatGPT and want the coding agent in that allowance.

## Google Antigravity vs Replit

[Google Antigravity vs Replit](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/google-antigravity-vs-replit)

Google Antigravity: Desktop agent IDE and CLI. Replit: Browser IDE with Agent, hosting, and a database.
If you do not want to read code, Replit is the closer fit.
Google Antigravity has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro at $19.99/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Google Antigravity if you are trying an editor agent without a subscription.
Pick Replit if you are learning by building a web app, script, or simple browser game in one place.

## Google Antigravity vs v0

[Google Antigravity vs v0](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/google-antigravity-vs-v0)

Google Antigravity: Desktop agent IDE and CLI. v0: Browser UI generator with deploy to Vercel.
If you do not want to read code, v0 is the closer fit.
Google Antigravity has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro at $19.99/mo.
For a website or landing page, v0 is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Google Antigravity is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Google Antigravity if you are trying an editor agent without a subscription.
Pick v0 if you are landing pages and React UI.

## Google Antigravity vs Windsurf

[Google Antigravity vs Windsurf](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/google-antigravity-vs-windsurf)

Google Antigravity: Desktop agent IDE and CLI. Windsurf: Devin Desktop editor, CLI, and Devin Cloud on paid plans.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Google Antigravity has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro at $19.99/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Google Antigravity if you are trying an editor agent without a subscription.
Pick Windsurf if you want an editor agent at $20 with frontier models and cloud agents.

## Jules vs Kiro

[Jules vs Kiro](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/jules-vs-kiro)

Jules: Browser agent that opens pull requests on GitHub. Kiro: Desktop IDE, CLI, and a paid web app for cloud sessions.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Jules has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro (Jules in Pro) at $19.99/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Jules if you want bug fixes, version bumps, and small features on a repo you already have.
Pick Kiro if you want a web app or automation you will keep in a repo and review as a diff.

## Jules vs Lovable

[Jules vs Lovable](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/jules-vs-lovable)

Jules: Browser agent that opens pull requests on GitHub. Lovable: Browser app builder with hosting, Git sync, and code export on paid plans.
If you do not want to read code, Lovable is the closer fit.
Jules has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro (Jules in Pro) at $19.99/mo.
For a website or landing page, Lovable is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Jules is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Jules if you want bug fixes, version bumps, and small features on a repo you already have.
Pick Lovable if you want a web app or SaaS you want to describe in the browser.

## Jules vs OpenAI Codex

[Jules vs OpenAI Codex](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/jules-vs-openai-codex)

Jules: Browser agent that opens pull requests on GitHub. OpenAI Codex: Desktop app, CLI, and IDE, included with ChatGPT.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Jules has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro (Jules in Pro) at $19.99/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Jules if you want bug fixes, version bumps, and small features on a repo you already have.
Pick OpenAI Codex if you already pay for ChatGPT and want the coding agent in that allowance.

## Jules vs Replit

[Jules vs Replit](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/jules-vs-replit)

Jules: Browser agent that opens pull requests on GitHub. Replit: Browser IDE with Agent, hosting, and a database.
If you do not want to read code, Replit is the closer fit.
Jules has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro (Jules in Pro) at $19.99/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Jules if you want bug fixes, version bumps, and small features on a repo you already have.
Pick Replit if you are learning by building a web app, script, or simple browser game in one place.

## Jules vs v0

[Jules vs v0](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/jules-vs-v0)

Jules: Browser agent that opens pull requests on GitHub. v0: Browser UI generator with deploy to Vercel.
If you do not want to read code, v0 is the closer fit.
Jules has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro (Jules in Pro) at $19.99/mo.
For a website or landing page, v0 is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Jules is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Jules if you want bug fixes, version bumps, and small features on a repo you already have.
Pick v0 if you are landing pages and React UI.

## Jules vs Windsurf

[Jules vs Windsurf](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/jules-vs-windsurf)

Jules: Browser agent that opens pull requests on GitHub. Windsurf: Devin Desktop editor, CLI, and Devin Cloud on paid plans.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Jules has the lower verified individual paid plan: Google AI Pro (Jules in Pro) at $19.99/mo.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Jules if you want bug fixes, version bumps, and small features on a repo you already have.
Pick Windsurf if you want an editor agent at $20 with frontier models and cloud agents.

## Kiro vs Lovable

[Kiro vs Lovable](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/kiro-vs-lovable)

Kiro: Desktop IDE, CLI, and a paid web app for cloud sessions. Lovable: Browser app builder with hosting, Git sync, and code export on paid plans.
If you do not want to read code, Lovable is the closer fit.
Kiro has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $20/user/mo.
For a website or landing page, Lovable is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Kiro is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Kiro if you want a web app or automation you will keep in a repo and review as a diff.
Pick Lovable if you want a web app or SaaS you want to describe in the browser.

## Kiro vs OpenAI Codex

[Kiro vs OpenAI Codex](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/kiro-vs-openai-codex)

Kiro: Desktop IDE, CLI, and a paid web app for cloud sessions. OpenAI Codex: Desktop app, CLI, and IDE, included with ChatGPT.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Kiro if you want a web app or automation you will keep in a repo and review as a diff.
Pick OpenAI Codex if you already pay for ChatGPT and want the coding agent in that allowance.

## Kiro vs Replit

[Kiro vs Replit](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/kiro-vs-replit)

Kiro: Desktop IDE, CLI, and a paid web app for cloud sessions. Replit: Browser IDE with Agent, hosting, and a database.
If you do not want to read code, Replit is the closer fit.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Kiro if you want a web app or automation you will keep in a repo and review as a diff.
Pick Replit if you are learning by building a web app, script, or simple browser game in one place.

## Kiro vs v0

[Kiro vs v0](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/kiro-vs-v0)

Kiro: Desktop IDE, CLI, and a paid web app for cloud sessions. v0: Browser UI generator with deploy to Vercel.
If you do not want to read code, v0 is the closer fit.
Kiro has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $20/user/mo.
For a web app or SaaS, Kiro is the stronger match in our weights.
For a website or landing page, v0 is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Kiro is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Kiro if you want a web app or automation you will keep in a repo and review as a diff.
Pick v0 if you are landing pages and React UI.

## Kiro vs Windsurf

[Kiro vs Windsurf](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/kiro-vs-windsurf)

Kiro: Desktop IDE, CLI, and a paid web app for cloud sessions. Windsurf: Devin Desktop editor, CLI, and Devin Cloud on paid plans.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Kiro if you want a web app or automation you will keep in a repo and review as a diff.
Pick Windsurf if you want an editor agent at $20 with frontier models and cloud agents.

## Lovable vs OpenAI Codex

[Lovable vs OpenAI Codex](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/lovable-vs-openai-codex)

Lovable: Browser app builder with hosting, Git sync, and code export on paid plans. OpenAI Codex: Desktop app, CLI, and IDE, included with ChatGPT.
If you do not want to read code, Lovable is the closer fit.
OpenAI Codex has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $20/mo.
For a website or landing page, Lovable is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, OpenAI Codex is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Lovable if you want a web app or SaaS you want to describe in the browser.
Pick OpenAI Codex if you already pay for ChatGPT and want the coding agent in that allowance.

## Lovable vs Replit

[Lovable vs Replit](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/lovable-vs-replit)

Lovable: Browser app builder with hosting, Git sync, and code export on paid plans. Replit: Browser IDE with Agent, hosting, and a database.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Replit has the lower verified individual paid plan: Core at $20/mo. That price is marked verify.
For a game, Replit is the stronger match in our weights.
For a website or landing page, Lovable is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Replit is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Lovable if you want a web app or SaaS you want to describe in the browser.
Pick Replit if you are learning by building a web app, script, or simple browser game in one place.

## Lovable vs v0

[Lovable vs v0](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/lovable-vs-v0)

Lovable: Browser app builder with hosting, Git sync, and code export on paid plans. v0: Browser UI generator with deploy to Vercel.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Lovable has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro 100 at $25/mo.
For a web app or SaaS, Lovable is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Lovable if you want a web app or SaaS you want to describe in the browser.
Pick v0 if you are landing pages and React UI.

## Lovable vs Windsurf

[Lovable vs Windsurf](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/lovable-vs-windsurf)

Lovable: Browser app builder with hosting, Git sync, and code export on paid plans. Windsurf: Devin Desktop editor, CLI, and Devin Cloud on paid plans.
If you do not want to read code, Lovable is the closer fit.
Windsurf has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $20/mo.
For a website or landing page, Lovable is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Windsurf is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Lovable if you want a web app or SaaS you want to describe in the browser.
Pick Windsurf if you want an editor agent at $20 with frontier models and cloud agents.

## OpenAI Codex vs Replit

[OpenAI Codex vs Replit](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/openai-codex-vs-replit)

OpenAI Codex: Desktop app, CLI, and IDE, included with ChatGPT. Replit: Browser IDE with Agent, hosting, and a database.
If you do not want to read code, Replit is the closer fit.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick OpenAI Codex if you already pay for ChatGPT and want the coding agent in that allowance.
Pick Replit if you are learning by building a web app, script, or simple browser game in one place.

## OpenAI Codex vs v0

[OpenAI Codex vs v0](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/openai-codex-vs-v0)

OpenAI Codex: Desktop app, CLI, and IDE, included with ChatGPT. v0: Browser UI generator with deploy to Vercel.
If you do not want to read code, v0 is the closer fit.
OpenAI Codex has the lower verified individual paid plan: Plus at $20/mo.
For a web app or SaaS, OpenAI Codex is the stronger match in our weights.
For a website or landing page, v0 is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, OpenAI Codex is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick OpenAI Codex if you already pay for ChatGPT and want the coding agent in that allowance.
Pick v0 if you are landing pages and React UI.

## OpenAI Codex vs Windsurf

[OpenAI Codex vs Windsurf](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/openai-codex-vs-windsurf)

OpenAI Codex: Desktop app, CLI, and IDE, included with ChatGPT. Windsurf: Devin Desktop editor, CLI, and Devin Cloud on paid plans.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick OpenAI Codex if you already pay for ChatGPT and want the coding agent in that allowance.
Pick Windsurf if you want an editor agent at $20 with frontier models and cloud agents.

## Replit vs v0

[Replit vs v0](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/replit-vs-v0)

Replit: Browser IDE with Agent, hosting, and a database. v0: Browser UI generator with deploy to Vercel.
Neither tool is a clear no-code winner over the other. Read the skill scores before you decide on comfort.
Replit has the lower verified individual paid plan: Core at $20/mo. That price is marked verify.
For a game, Replit is the stronger match in our weights.
For a website or landing page, v0 is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Replit is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick Replit if you are learning by building a web app, script, or simple browser game in one place.
Pick v0 if you are landing pages and React UI.

## Replit vs Windsurf

[Replit vs Windsurf](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/replit-vs-windsurf)

Replit: Browser IDE with Agent, hosting, and a database. Windsurf: Devin Desktop editor, CLI, and Devin Cloud on paid plans.
If you do not want to read code, Replit is the closer fit.
On the kind of project, these two are close. Budget and where you want to work should break the tie.
Pick Replit if you are learning by building a web app, script, or simple browser game in one place.
Pick Windsurf if you want an editor agent at $20 with frontier models and cloud agents.

## v0 vs Windsurf

[v0 vs Windsurf](https://fitbuildai.com/compare/v0-vs-windsurf)

v0: Browser UI generator with deploy to Vercel. Windsurf: Devin Desktop editor, CLI, and Devin Cloud on paid plans.
If you do not want to read code, v0 is the closer fit.
Windsurf has the lower verified individual paid plan: Pro at $20/mo.
For a web app or SaaS, Windsurf is the stronger match in our weights.
For a website or landing page, v0 is the stronger match in our weights.
For an automation or script, Windsurf is the stronger match in our weights.
Pick v0 if you are landing pages and React UI.
Pick Windsurf if you want an editor agent at $20 with frontier models and cloud agents.

# Guides

## Lovable vs Bolt vs Replit

[Lovable vs Bolt vs Replit](https://fitbuildai.com/guides/lovable-vs-bolt-vs-replit)

A beginner decision guide for Lovable, Bolt, and Replit: who each browser builder is for, the free and paid floors from public plans, and when to move the project into an editor.

## Cursor vs Claude Code vs Codex

[Cursor vs Claude Code vs Codex](https://fitbuildai.com/guides/cursor-vs-claude-code-vs-codex)

Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex do different jobs: an editor, a terminal agent, and the coding agent bundled with ChatGPT. Plans are the public ones, including when a beginner should not start here.

## Best free AI coding tools

[Best free AI coding tools](https://fitbuildai.com/guides/best-free-ai-coding-tools)

A free-tier reality check for every AI coding tool Fitbuild ranks. Allowances come from the public plan rows. Where a vendor does not publish a count, the page says so.

## Can you vibe code a SaaS?

[Can you vibe code a SaaS?](https://fitbuildai.com/guides/can-you-vibe-code-a-saas)

Personal use and a multi-user SaaS are different jobs. How far browser builders go, when to move the repo into an editor, and the auth, tenant, and billing work a prompt does not finish.

## From a browser builder to Cursor

[From a browser builder to Cursor](https://fitbuildai.com/guides/from-browser-builder-to-cursor)

When to upgrade Lovable, Bolt, or Replit, and when to move the project into Cursor or another editor after credits run out or the repo outgrows the browser.

## Where to host your AI-built app

[Where to host your AI-built app](https://fitbuildai.com/guides/where-to-host-your-ai-built-app)

Where to put an app you built with AI, and where the data should live. Free limits and paid starting prices for Vercel, Netlify, Cloudflare, Render, Railway, Lovable, Bolt, and Replit, checked 2026-10-22.

## Supabase vs Firebase for beginners

[Supabase vs Firebase for beginners](https://fitbuildai.com/guides/supabase-vs-firebase-for-beginners)

Supabase and Firebase for a first app built with AI. Free quotas, the first paid price, auth, and which browser builders connect natively. Figures are from the official pricing pages, checked 2026-10-22.

## Security checklist for AI-built apps

[Security checklist for AI-built apps](https://fitbuildai.com/guides/security-checklist-for-ai-built-apps)

A pre-launch checklist for an app built with AI: public env vars, Supabase row level security, Firebase rules, ownership checks, Stripe webhook signatures, backups, and keeping the agent off production data.

## How to take payments in your AI-built app

[How to take payments in your AI-built app](https://fitbuildai.com/guides/how-to-take-payments-in-your-ai-built-app)

Stripe, Lemon Squeezy, Paddle, and Polar for an app built with AI. Fees, who handles sales tax, where payouts can go, and which to pick. Figures are from each company's pricing or fee docs, checked 2026-10-22.

# Price changes

[AI app builder price changes](https://fitbuildai.com/price-changes)

Prices are checked every Monday. A dated entry is added only when a plan or a price in the catalog changes. The page also lists each tool's current verified price and the last date it was checked.

- October 19, 2026 — Cursor: Cursor changed which plans a new customer can buy. Cursor's pricing page calls that lineup The X Subscription. Plus was added at $8/mo, Premium at $30/mo, and Super at $100/mo. Ultra stayed $200/mo, and an annual price of $2,000/yr was recorded. The old Ultra description recorded $400 of included Other Models usage. That amount is not in the new Ultra description. The free plan that counts is named Free. Hobby remains a legacy free plan. Pro at $20/mo and Pro+ at $60/mo are now legacy plans, marked Verify, and they are not used for the quiz. Pro+ had recorded $70 of included Other Models usage. The legacy row says that $70 figure is no longer printed on the current page. New team seats were recorded at $30, $100, and $200 per user a month. The older team prices of $40 and $120 stayed on legacy rows.
- October 19, 2026 — Bolt.new: Bolt Pro stayed $25/mo. Fitbuild changed that row from Verified to Verify. The new annual note records a worked example of $216/year, which is not 10% off $25/mo. The monthly price did not change.
- October 19, 2026 — Replit: Replit Core stayed $20/mo. The October 14 annual note recorded $18/mo billed annually, $20, and an earlier view at $17. The October 19 annual note still records $18/mo billed annually and $20, and it does not mention $17. The monthly price did not change.
- October 19, 2026 — v0: v0 Plus stayed $30/user/mo. On October 14 the note said this plan sits above a strict $20 cap. On October 19 the note said the pricing page showed $30/user/month with $90 struck through beside it. The recorded plan price stayed $30/user/mo.
- October 19, 2026 — Kiro: Kiro was added to Fitbuild on October 19, 2026. These are the first prices recorded here. They are not a change from an older Fitbuild price.
- October 19, 2026 — Jules: Jules was added to Fitbuild on October 19, 2026. These are the first prices recorded here. They are not a change from an older Fitbuild price.
- October 19, 2026 — Amp: Amp was added to Fitbuild on October 19, 2026. These are the first prices recorded here. They are not a change from an older Fitbuild price.
- October 19, 2026: These tools were checked again on October 19, 2026. Their monthly prices, and the dollar amounts written in their plan notes, matched the October 14, 2026 record. No price change was added.